Do not
be swayed by the article title, I tell you that will not talk about sex, but
how heavy sex and companies who decide how they value it. Everything is due to
visit this week to a friend who had just opened a family business. I was very
surprised to find that his entire team was made up of men, when the activity
that developed was perfectly suited for women. His argument was clear: women are
more likely to be low than men, said. Where does this very objective
differentiation of effort or commitment? You like it or not, are there, latent
in every recruitment companies.
As
discussed prudent, gender inequality benefits the economy because it helps
companies make more rational decisions in the short term, which should assess
the possible setbacks in terms of frequency of permits, exposure to stress, etc.
You may or may not agree with this, but it is what determines the market
itself, and consequently the lines are responsible for hiring the workforce.
I will say that this system not objective explains how, in many countries
the number of women going to college far exceeds that of men, which determines
a much more educated social mass, but the salary earned is 45 % less than they.
Unfortunately, corporate economic decisions are still reflections of the male
starting. Therefore, even having more women in universities, our labor market
absorbs only half of them, in proportion to hiring hands for men.
Links to other articles
- Who knows plan- Human capital - Decalogue to innovate - Finding a way - The ability to manage success - How much a dream costs? |
Moreover,
as we have said many times, there is evidence that women make better academic
results than men, but almost no leadership positions or very few manage to
launch her own business. And if we look at the jobs where they perform the
same tasks that they, not surprising to find that they make more than them. Is
this reasonable? I'm afraid not.
"Tell
them that you, a man and if you make it", I used to say my partner when an
internal conflict should be resolved. She was not getting out of the middle or
belittling their contribution to the company simply was realistic and was
considering the possibility of solving problems immediately. This really is
more cultural than economic.
Returning
to the argument of my entrepreneur friend, I must admit that there is an
undeniable truth in its reasoning, not in terms of the propensity of women to
ask permission, but many entrepreneurs think the same. Naturally, you cannot
blame them, because the hierarchical structures are designed in this way, where
men, until recently, at least in our society, the family remained economically
and women took care of the house. That's what leads to a responsible human
resources arises, to the need to hire for a job, if a man will be less exposed
to the aid of family needs short term or not.
Therefore, if someone claims that we are balancing the scales in terms of
equality in the labor market, I would say that is not right. In many sectors,
not even been raised that equality and gender assessments to prioritize even
when hiring.
image:@morguefile
If you enjoyed this article, share it. Thank you.
Tweetear
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Escribe un comentario. Solo pido moderación y respeto.